While my mother (and brother) visited for the Thanksgiving holiday, we enjoyed two wines:
-- Goose Watch Pinot Noir Brut Rose
-- Broadbent Vinho Verde
I already formally reviewed the Broadbent wine; however, I will not be reviewing the Goose Watch champagne at this time. I thoroughly enjoyed both and anticipate purchasing both bottles again in the future.
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Thanksgiving Holiday
Labels:
broadbent,
champagne,
goose watch,
no review,
pinot noir,
rose,
vinho verde
Friday, November 20, 2009
Fulkerson - 2005 Delaware
Tasted on: November 20, 2009
Purchased for: <$10
Wine Data:
Appearance: Very clear. very slight straw tinge.
Aroma: Wonderful bouquet. Fruit notes are the strongest. Pear, perhaps?
Taste / Texture: Boy howdy, is there sugar. The sweetness almost overwhelms the flavor, but not completely. The sugar comes first and then the taste of the grapes. I can't pinpoint the flavor.
Aftertaste: Lasting and coating on the tongue (probably due to the sugar).
Decision: Way too sweet for my tastes. 65/100
Purchased for: <$10
Wine Data:
- Alcohol Content: 12%
- Residual Sugar: 4.5%
Appearance: Very clear. very slight straw tinge.
Aroma: Wonderful bouquet. Fruit notes are the strongest. Pear, perhaps?
Taste / Texture: Boy howdy, is there sugar. The sweetness almost overwhelms the flavor, but not completely. The sugar comes first and then the taste of the grapes. I can't pinpoint the flavor.
Aftertaste: Lasting and coating on the tongue (probably due to the sugar).
Decision: Way too sweet for my tastes. 65/100
Friday, November 13, 2009
Swedish Hill - Natural Sparkling Wine
Tasted on: November 13, 2009
Purchased for: ~$20
Wine Data:
Appearance: Very clear. slight yellow-green tint. Very active bubbles and head.
Aroma: Very aromatic with strong citrus notes. Not overwhelming and harmonious.
Taste / Texture: Strong citrus flavor (pears? apples?) with a hint of mineral. Mineral seems a bit too strong to make the flavors sing together. Crisp. Doesn't make my tongue tingle, though.
Aftertaste: Lasting and somewhat coating on the tongue.
Decision: Nice champagne, but definitely not the best that I've had (that prize goes to Chateau de Frank). Wouldn't buy it again because the price doesn't seem to correlate with the quality. 75/100
Purchased for: ~$20
Wine Data:
- Alcohol Content: 12%
- Residual Sugar: 1.4%
- Gold Medal Int'l Eastern, NY 5/09
- Gold Medal Riverside Int'l, CA 5/09
- Gold Medal & Best of Class Pacific Rim Int'l, CA 4/09
- Gold Medal Pacific Rim Int'l, CA 4/09
- Gold Medal Florida State Fair Int'l, FL 2/09
Appearance: Very clear. slight yellow-green tint. Very active bubbles and head.
Aroma: Very aromatic with strong citrus notes. Not overwhelming and harmonious.
Taste / Texture: Strong citrus flavor (pears? apples?) with a hint of mineral. Mineral seems a bit too strong to make the flavors sing together. Crisp. Doesn't make my tongue tingle, though.
Aftertaste: Lasting and somewhat coating on the tongue.
Decision: Nice champagne, but definitely not the best that I've had (that prize goes to Chateau de Frank). Wouldn't buy it again because the price doesn't seem to correlate with the quality. 75/100
Labels:
champagne,
dry,
no vintage,
sparkling,
swedish hill
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)